A damning audit has exposed serious problems with the Australian Defence Force's $7.3 billion Redback infantry fighting vehicle project, revealing major delays, design flaws, and significant governance failures that threaten the safety of troops.
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) report, released on Thursday, found that the project to deliver 129 Redback vehicles to the Army is running years behind schedule and has been plagued by technical deficiencies.
Key Findings of the Audit
The audit highlighted that the Redback vehicles, intended to replace the ageing M113 armoured personnel carriers, have failed to meet critical performance requirements. These include issues with the vehicle's protection systems, mobility, and weapon integration.
According to the report, the project has experienced delays of up to three years, with the initial operating capability now not expected until 2027. The ANAO also criticised Defence for poor contract management and a lack of oversight.
Design Flaws and Safety Concerns
One of the most concerning findings relates to the vehicle's design flaws, which could compromise soldier safety in combat situations. The audit noted that the Redback's armour protection and mine blast resistance did not meet the specified standards during testing.
"The project has not demonstrated that the Redback vehicle can safely transport troops in high-threat environments," the report stated. "This raises significant risks for the Australian Defence Force personnel."
Cost Overruns and Budget Blowouts
The project, originally budgeted at $5.4 billion, has ballooned to $7.3 billion due to the delays and required remediation work. The ANAO warned that further cost increases are likely as Defence works to rectify the identified issues.
"The full cost of delivering a capable and safe vehicle is uncertain," the audit said. "Defence must urgently address the program's shortcomings to avoid further financial waste."
Government Response
In response to the audit, the Department of Defence acknowledged the findings and stated that it is implementing a remediation plan. A Defence spokesperson said that the department is working closely with Hanwha Defense Australia, the South Korean manufacturer, to resolve the technical problems.
"We are committed to delivering a world-class vehicle for our soldiers," the spokesperson said. "The issues identified are being addressed with the highest priority."
However, opposition defence spokesperson Andrew Hastie criticised the government's handling of the project. "This is a shocking indictment of the Labor government's management of defence procurement," he said. "Australian soldiers deserve better than this."
Impact on Army Capability
The delays have left the Army with a capability gap, as the M113 vehicles are increasingly obsolete and vulnerable. The audit warned that the prolonged timeline could affect the Army's ability to meet its operational commitments.
Defence analysts have also raised concerns about the broader implications for Australia's defence posture. "The Redback is a critical component of the Army's modernisation plans," said Dr. John Coyne, a defence strategist. "These delays undermine our ability to protect national security."
Way Forward
The ANAO has recommended that Defence conduct a comprehensive review of the project's governance and contract management. It also called for independent verification of the vehicle's performance against requirements before accepting further deliveries.
Defence has accepted the recommendations and says it will provide regular progress reports to the government. The first operational Redback vehicles are now expected to be delivered in late 2025, with full capability not anticipated until 2029.
The audit has reignited debate over Defence's procurement processes, with calls for greater transparency and accountability in major projects. As the Redback saga continues, the focus remains on ensuring that Australian troops are equipped with safe and effective equipment.
