A recent series of high-stakes planning decisions by the City of Greater Geelong council has created a stark divide within the local development community, leaving some figures furious and others celebrating major wins. The council's verdicts on several significant applications have underscored the volatile and often unpredictable nature of the urban planning landscape in the region.
Controversial Verdicts on Major Projects
In one of the most contentious moves, the council rejected a proposal from developers Salta Properties and Villawood Properties for a substantial industrial estate in Mount Duneed. The plan, which involved 14 lots across 11.5 hectares on the northern side of Barwon Heads Road, was knocked back despite a recommendation for approval from the council's own planning officers. The decision was made at a council meeting on Tuesday, April 23, 2024.
Councillors opposing the project cited concerns about its location within the Green Wedge zone and potential conflicts with the long-term vision for the area's growth. This rejection has ignited significant frustration among the proponents, who had invested considerable time and resources into the application.
Winners and Losers in the Planning Lottery
In stark contrast, the same council meeting delivered a triumph for other developers. A separate application for a 15-lot subdivision on 4.2 hectares of land at 380-400 Colac Road in Herne Hill was approved. This project, put forward by Mackenzie's Beach Estate Pty Ltd, will see the land developed for residential purposes, creating new housing opportunities in the area.
Furthermore, the council greenlit plans for a new medical centre in Grovedale. The facility, proposed for the corner of Torquay and Grossmans roads, will feature 11 consulting rooms, a procedure room, and a pharmacy. This decision was welcomed as a boost to local healthcare services and infrastructure.
The Fallout and Future Implications
The sharply divergent outcomes highlight the subjective and often political elements that can influence planning decisions. For the developers behind the rejected Mount Duneed industrial estate, the council's move to override its officers' advice represents a significant setback and raises questions about investment certainty. The industry is now closely watching to see if this decision signals a broader shift in policy or appetite for certain types of development within the municipality.
These rulings underscore the high-risk environment of property development, where millions of dollars can hinge on the interpretations and priorities of elected officials. The City of Greater Geelong's decisions are likely to resonate through the local business community, influencing where and how developers choose to propose future projects. The mixed results serve as a potent reminder that in the world of urban planning, for every project that soars, another can be grounded by council decree.
