A frustrated Melbourne homeowner has invested over $100,000 transforming his property into a high-tech fortress after falling victim to a brazen criminal act, only to find himself battling local council officials who want his security measures removed.
The Brazen Break-In That Changed Everything
Will Henderson's Brighton home became the target of a masked thief who demonstrated alarming sophistication during the crime. The intruder arrived prepared with woollen gloves and tape to disable security cameras, then managed to override the vehicle's security systems and disable built-in GPS tracking.
The Bayside father's concerns extend far beyond simple property theft. "You worry that if they did come into your house with a knife and, you know, if they did wake up your children, imagine what effect that would have on them," Henderson expressed, highlighting the deeper fears driving his security investments.
Building a Modern Fortress
Henderson's comprehensive security overhaul includes multiple significant upgrades designed to protect his family. He has installed prison-grade glass, protective spikes, and an advanced camera system that has already proven valuable to local police investigations.
The controversial camera setup features an antenna that enhances garage door security by using radio frequencies that thieves cannot hack, along with mounted cameras equipped with numberplate recognition technology. Police have already used footage from Henderson's system to track suspects who stole three cars from residents in a neighbouring street just yesterday morning.
"I feel a lot safer now," Henderson stated, reflecting on the peace of mind his security investments have brought.
Council Opposition and Community Support
Despite the clear security benefits, Bayside Council claims Henderson's camera system violates regulations and is investigating a complaint about the installation. The council's position contrasts sharply with the support Henderson has received from neighbours and local police.
One neighbour defended Henderson's measures, saying, "He's just trying to protect his home. He's just trying to protect his family." Another resident welcomed the enhanced security, noting, "I'm glad they are here because we have such a high crime rate right now, especially in our area."
A supporter of Henderson's approach questioned why extreme measures become necessary, stating "Why are people going to extremes to protect their homes? Because we're seeing extreme crimes."
Henderson maintains that his camera installation complies with the Telecommunications Act, which permits cameras to be installed on antenna masts. The situation highlights the growing tension between individual security needs and council regulations in an era of increasing property crime.
