Children whose parents hit them at the ages of three, five and seven were significantly less likely to pass their GCSEs, according to a new study by University College London (UCL). The research also found that physically punished children are more likely to bully others, causing a negative impact on society.
Key Findings of the UCL Study
The study, which analyzed data from 19,000 children born in the UK in the early 2000s, revealed that teenagers who experienced physical punishment in early childhood were markedly more likely to bully siblings and others or engage in cyberbullying. Even after accounting for factors such as family background, children who were smacked at ages three, five and seven were significantly less likely to pass their GCSE exams compared with their peers.
Impact on Academic Performance
The effects of smacking appeared most immediately in behavior problems among infants, while repeated experience of physical punishment at ages three, five and seven was associated with lower literacy. Young people who experienced physical punishment in childhood were less likely to achieve passing grades in GCSE subjects. After taking family circumstances, parental attitudes and socio-economic background into account, 48% of children who suffered repeated exposure to punishment failed to pass five GCSEs, including English and maths, compared with 42% of those who had not experienced it. The effects of smacking on boys appeared to be more detrimental than for girls.
Behavioral Consequences
Among the young people surveyed, smacking was also associated with antisocial behaviors towards others at age 14, including bullying, aggression and vandalism. The study concluded that physical punishment may have a negative impact on society as a whole.
Calls for Legal Change
The findings have revived calls by experts, MPs and children’s welfare charities for legislators in England and Northern Ireland to take action. Joanna Barrett, the NSPCC’s associate head of policy, said: “This UCL research shows yet again that physical punishment does not improve children’s behaviour and in fact has an adverse impact on their wellbeing and links to poorer outcomes in the future. As is already the case in Scotland and Wales, children in England and Northern Ireland should be afforded the same protection from assault as adults. It’s time to change the law and remove the defence of reasonable punishment once and for all.”
Jess Asato, the MP for Lowestoft, said: “The government must act on the recommendations of this report urgently. Scotland and Wales have already shown there is a way forward that works. Now it is time for England to follow.”
A spokesperson for the Department for Education said the new Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act in England “will provide greater protection for vulnerable children who are at risk of abuse and neglect” but said the government has “no plans to legislate at this stage” for a smacking ban. The law in England allows parents to use “reasonable punishment” as a defence if accused of hitting their child under Section 58 of the Children Act 2004.
Prevalence of Physical Punishment
UCL’s research found that physical punishment was still used by parents against more than 20% of 10-year-olds in 2020-21, and was likely to be more common against younger children in their preschool years. Dr Anja Heilmann, the principal investigator and an associate professor at UCL, said the study’s key recommendation was for England and Northern Ireland to change their laws allowing “reasonable punishment”, such as smacking by relatives. “The decisions by lawmakers in Northern Ireland, and last year in England, to drop plans to outlaw physical punishment are a huge missed opportunity and deeply disappointing. Children have the right to be brought up free from all forms of violence,” Heilman said.
