Builders behind the tree removal on Teranca Road, Greenfields, have responded to community backlash, stating the benefits of the housing development outweigh the loss of mature trees.
Development Plans and Tree Removal
Lilcon Pty Ltd, the builder responsible for clearing several mature tuarts and other trees on the property, acknowledged that removing mature trees can be emotionally confronting but emphasised their commitment to replanting. The company stated that many of the trees on the site were dead, dying, or in poor condition, with only one tree deemed salvageable, which unfortunately was located in the path of the proposed road.
“We decided it was better to implement a full replanting program and repurpose all existing timber,” a company spokesperson said.
Timber Repurposing and Replanting
The harvested timber will be responsibly repurposed, with large portions used as natural play equipment in local Mandurah parks, extending the life of the trees and benefiting the community. Remaining timber will be transformed into furniture, preventing waste. The development also includes replanting a mature tree on each new lot to restore canopy and habitat over time.
Housing Diversity and Lot Sizes
With lots expected to be available by the end of the year, the builders emphasised their focus on providing reasonably sized properties. “We’ve been conscious not to create postage stamp-sized lots. This area needs bigger blocks,” they said. The development will offer green title residential blocks zoned R20/R25, ranging from approximately 350 to 582 square metres, contributing to housing diversity while maintaining the existing urban character of Greenfields and Riverside.
Community Concerns and Regulatory Compliance
Nearby residents expressed concern that the trees were part of a preservation area and questioned why the City of Mandurah approved the removal. A City of Mandurah spokesperson clarified that the trees were on private land zoned residential and, as the land was previously subdivided, tree removal did not require development approval under the city’s planning framework. The spokesperson also noted that while another address on the street appears on the significant tree registry, these trees were not listed.
The builders confirmed that all works were carried out in full compliance with regulations. “Assertions that this was unlawful or unauthorised are incorrect,” they said. While respecting residents’ right to express concern, they urged that discussions be grounded in facts. “Responsible development requires honesty, balance, and acknowledgment that growth, when properly planned, is essential. We remain committed to working within the planning framework, delivering quality housing, and ensuring environmental responsibility through replanting and reuse.”
