An ambitious pub redevelopment in Western Australia has been thrown into chaos after the local council pulled the plug on the venue's liquor licence, sparking threats from the publican to walk away from his $1.5 million investment entirely.
Arthur Barrett, the seasoned publican behind the proposed Stirling Arms Hotel revamp, has declared he's ready to 'throw in the towel' after the City of Stirling council revoked his hard-won liquor licence following complaints from nearby residents.
The decision came after what Barrett describes as a 'concerted campaign' by a small group of neighbours in the quiet suburban area of Innaloo, who raised concerns about potential noise, parking issues, and the impact on their peaceful neighbourhood.
'It's a massive blow' - Publican's frustration boils over
'We've done everything by the book,' Barrett told local media, his frustration palpable. 'We jumped through every hoop, met every requirement, and now we're being shut down because a few people don't want a pub in their backyard.'
The project, which would have seen the historic Stirling Arms transformed into a modern hospitality venue, now hangs in the balance. Barrett had already invested significant time and money into the development, with construction well underway before the licence was unexpectedly revoked.
The NIMBY effect on small business
This case highlights the growing tension between urban development and residential concerns across Australian suburbs. The 'Not In My Backyard' (NIMBY) phenomenon is increasingly affecting small businesses trying to establish or expand operations in mixed-use zones.
'This isn't just about one pub,' Barrett explained. 'It's about whether small businesses can survive the approval process when faced with organised opposition from neighbours. We're creating jobs, revitalising a local landmark, and contributing to the local economy - but none of that seems to matter.'
What happens next for the Stirling Arms?
Barrett now faces a difficult decision: appeal the council's decision through formal channels, or cut his losses and abandon the project entirely.
'I'm seriously considering walking away,' he admitted. 'Why would I pour more money into fighting this when the goalposts can just be moved again? It sends a terrible message to anyone thinking of investing in hospitality in this state.'
The council maintains it's following due process and responding to legitimate community concerns, but for Barrett and his team, the future looks increasingly uncertain.
