The City of Greater Geelong is facing tough questions about its spending priorities after revelations that floating tree decorations throughout the municipality are costing ratepayers approximately $600,000 annually.
This substantial expenditure came to light during recent council budget discussions, sparking debate among councillors about whether the decorative elements represent value for money during a period of financial constraint.
Council Divided Over Decorative Spending
Councillor Ron Nelson raised concerns about the ongoing cost during budget deliberations, questioning the allocation of significant funds to what he described as "floating balls in trees" when other community services face funding challenges.
The $600,000 annual expense covers installation, maintenance, and removal of the decorative elements that have become a familiar sight in various locations across the Geelong municipality.
Council staff confirmed the figure while defending the program as part of the city's broader beautification strategy. They argued that the decorations contribute to creating an attractive urban environment that benefits both residents and visitors.
Budget Pressures Force Hard Choices
The revelation comes as the City of Greater Geelong, like many local governments across Australia, faces increasing budget pressures from rising operational costs and infrastructure demands.
Cr Nelson expressed frustration that such a significant amount was being allocated to decorations while other areas of council responsibility might be underfunded. He specifically questioned whether this spending aligned with community expectations regarding how their rates money should be utilized.
Other councillors acknowledged the cost was substantial but noted that city beautification formed an important part of council's responsibilities. The debate highlighted the difficult balancing act local governments face between practical infrastructure spending and creating appealing public spaces.
Future of Geelong's Floating Decorations
While no immediate decision was made to remove the decorations, the discussion has placed the future of the program in doubt. Councillors have requested more detailed information about the benefits and costs associated with the decorative elements.
The controversy emerges as the council prepares its next annual budget, with all expenditures facing increased scrutiny. Ratepayers can expect further debate about how their money is spent as the council attempts to balance aesthetic improvements with essential services.
Community feedback is likely to play a role in determining whether the floating tree decorations remain a feature of Geelong's urban landscape or become a casualty of budget reevaluation.
