The Western Australian government has confirmed significant changes to the planned Burswood amphitheatre, reducing its capacity by nearly half amid ongoing controversy about the future of the Perth racing club.
Venue Capacity Slashed in Revised Plans
The new outdoor entertainment venue will now accommodate approximately 15,000 people, a substantial reduction from the originally proposed 25,000-seat capacity. Premier Roger Cook defended the decision, stating that size doesn't determine the quality of the entertainment experience.
During a recent press conference, Mr Cook emphasized that the scaled-down design would still deliver world-class performances to Western Australians. The government maintains that the revised capacity represents the optimal balance between functionality and community benefit.
Racing Club Relocation Sparks Political Debate
The amphitheatre announcement has become entangled in the heated discussion about relocating the Perth racing club from its current Ascot location to make way for social housing. Opposition Leader Shane Love has questioned the government's priorities, suggesting entertainment venues are receiving attention while housing solutions face delays.
Mr Love directly challenged the Premier in Parliament, asking why the government was proceeding with an entertainment precinct while the racing club relocation timeline remains uncertain. The opposition has raised concerns about the potential impact on the racing industry and the broader implications for urban planning in the area.
Government Defends Dual Project Approach
Premier Cook responded to criticism by highlighting that both projects can progress simultaneously. He stated that the new amphitheatre would operate independently of the racing club's future location and represents a separate investment in Western Australia's cultural infrastructure.
The government has committed to beginning amphitheatre construction later this year, with completion expected in time for the 2025-26 summer events season. Meanwhile, planning continues for the potential relocation of the racing club facilities, though specific timelines remain under development.
Community reaction to both projects has been mixed, with some welcoming additional entertainment options while others express concern about the prioritization of public spending. The debate continues as both projects move through their respective planning stages.
